How A Diode Detectors Produce A Voltage Proportional To Incident Power - By David Alexander Straight
Consider the following circuit.

V1 and R1 represent an RF source, where V1 is an ideal voltage source and R1 is the impedance of the source. R2 is used to match the detector circuit so that the source terminates in its character istic impedance (R1). C1 is large so that V(t) appears across the diode (AC shunted to ground by C1 ).
If C1 has zero volts across its terminals at t=0+ and at this same instant V(t) is applied (which is the same as when V1 is applied) the capacitor will begin to charge. Note that V1 magnitude is on the order of milli-volts.
The current in the diode is described by the Ebers-Moll equation
![]()
where
is the diode current
is the saturation current of the diode
is charge in Coulombs
is Boltzmann’s constant
is the temperature in Kelvins.
The current can be approximated about the origin using a Taylor Series Expansion

Equation 2
For very small signals across the diodes terminals the Taylor Series can be reduced to its first two terms.

If the input waveform is a sinusoid then we can replace
with
to obtain

Equation 4
Where
![]()
and
, the voltage across the diode, was replaced by ![]()
Simplification of Equation 4 shows three terms, a DC term and two AC terms consisting of the original frequency and a second harmonic.

.
The average of this current is
, where Tn is a multiple of the period of i(t).
When
is substituted for Equation 5 the average current for the pure sinusoid input,
, is
. Note that it contains a voltage square d term indicating that the DC component of current is proportional to power. The three sources I’ve used in writing this derivation stop at this point (or stop with the derivation of Equation 3). My goal is to prove that the voltage, Vout, that d evelops across C1 in Figure 4 is proportional to the voltage input (i.e. power). My motivation stemmed from the fact that if the voltage,
, across the diode remained constant then a con stant current (DC) would be entering the capacitor, which according to
would yield an unbounded Vout across the capacitor, the circuit would be unstable and accumulating endless energy, if this were the cas e I’m sure the electric company would have utilized this circuit. Realizing that the voltage across the terminals of the diode had to change
with time as the capacitor built up a stored charged, my first step was to find a function for the voltage across the diode. Then, I would be able to solve for the voltage across the capacitor.
The circuit I used following this pursuit is shown in Figure 5 below.

Where VTH and RTH make up the Thévenin equivalent of the source of Figure 4 The voltage loop around this circuit is
which is the same as
. Substituting Equation 3 into this gives
![]()
Equation 6
which, when differentiated with respect to time, gives a nonlinear differential equation due to
being squared.
At first, I was eager to solve this for a general solution. However, this will have to wait for the time being. My experiences from school and my Co-Op have pointed out the value of knowing when to approximate something. This is especially valuable w hen time is of the essence, which I’ve found to be true both at work and school. Rather than learning how I might go about solving this differential equation I decided to take a more intuitive approach. I started with a basic I-V curve of a diode and a sked myself questions about how this circuit could work.
The obvious fact was the voltage developing across the capacitor is not unbounded, it reaches some steady state. The reason the capacitor reaches a steady state voltage is that as it charges up the bias voltage across the diode changes. When a small AC signal is applied to the diode circuit, the diode will conduct in both directions see Equation 3. However, it does favor the forward bias current a little more than the reverse bias current for small AC signals, enabling it to rectify even at very low voltage values. Incidentally, the reason why the average current, when solved for, contains a DC component, is that it is rectifying. At some point the capacitor will charge up to the exact voltage required that causes the forward bias conduct ion current to exactly match the reverse bias conduction current in such a way as to maintain the same average number of coulombs in the capacitor, thus there is an average voltage, or DC voltage across the capacitor.
Rearranging the voltage loop equation gives of Figure 5 gives![]()
which is approximately the same as
![]()
Provided the voltage across RTH is small compared to the voltage across Vd. Equation 7 is a better description of what the diode sees over time, when the circuit reaches a steady state value. I used this to calculate the diode’s current, which is
Finding the average current of Equation 8 gives
.
Equation 9
If the circuit is to reach a steady state value then the average current (which is the same as the DC component of the current) will be zero, therefore
is set to zero and A is solved for giving
.
This is the value is very close the voltage built up on the capacitor (because very little voltage develops across the Thévenin resistance) and it can be shown that it is proportional to the voltage squared. If Equation 10 is rearranged algebrai cally then some constant, B, will equal the voltage squared.
![]()
Equation 11
Feel free to leave me email at dstraigh@ix.netcom.com