UNKNOWN AIR TRAFFIC

Travis Walton ( Snowflake, AZ. )

evidence:  Statistical probability of a "group" hoax is the product of the probability of each, taken individually.  p(hoax) = .00001 for each time the "group" took the lie-detector tests.  They took the tests at least two separate times, by at least two equipment operators.  Total probability is p1*p2 = 0.  (  I used a conservative p = .1 as the probability of someone successfully lying on the poly-test.  Also, is useful to note here that the polygraph test, although not admissable as evidence in court, is used regularly by law enforcement as a tool through which to gain working leads and hypotheses leading to successful arrests and convictions.  Hence, the polygraph test is NOT here proposed as conclusive evidence, but certainly it is acceptable enough to provide physical support for the gathered testimony. )

Therefore, there was NO hoax being perpetrated by the "group" involved.  The evidence is the lie detector records, and the historical accounts by those present.  This is hard, measurable evidence which supports the "group" descriptions as given.  There is TRUTH here.  Was it alien? Was it extraterrestrial?
 
 
 

The Westchester Wing  (1984)...
    "Hudson Valley Sightings"  ... in New York in the 1980's
The local was Brewster NY,  1984... Multiple sightings over period of weeks. Large Delta shape... illegal lighting
configuration, and colors. Research was lead by J.Allen Hynek. ( It was his last gig. )
Broad spectrum witness-profile, multiples and singles, upstanding citizens. No sound, low flyer... lit up like a christmas tree... all
illegal.
      It was during this set of event reports that Whitley Strieber claims to have been experiencing abduction/contacts.
 
 
 

        -- 1997: The Phoenix Lights Case (March 13th...)  Researched by Bill Hamilton, heavily testimonied, and video taped.  Testimonies were collected, and triangulated to reveal the 3D model-track of a giant UFO manuvering above a long track of Arizona territory.
                                                                           ... 
The POINT is TRIANGULATION.  The testimonies were carefully collected, and the content was
triangulated.  This, along with the many videos of the incidents, is hard, measurable evidence
which supports the descriptive contents of the testimonies.  NOT absolute proof, but definitive
and enough to draw a vehicular-ufo conjecture.
 
 

WASHINGTON D.C.  1952

       On July 19,1952 a formation of seven "blips" entered the restricted airspace over the
       White House. One week later, on July 26,1952 the "blips" again appeared, prompting the
       Air Force to vector two F-94s toward the objects. In a CIA memo dated July 28,1952 to
       the Deputy Director/Intelligence from Ralph L. Clark, Acting Assistant Director of Scientific
       Intelligence stated: "In the past several weeks numerous UFOs have been sighted visually
       and on RADAR."
       On August 1, 1952 there was another CIA memo - this time from the acting Chief of
       Weapons and Equipment Division which said in part "It is strongly urged, however, that no
       indication of CIA interest or concern reach the press or public."
       The government ended their investigation of these sightings after taking the position that
       they were nothing more than radar mirages caused by temperature inversions...even
       though there were visual confirmations of many of the radar images.

Noteworthy:  Numerous reports of visual sightings, AND two seperate radars' records ( military, and civil radar ).  This is testimony, and evidence... a clear measure of truth is present.

Question regarding the temperature inversion theory:   Are there more incidents of the same nature and description available from any time previous to, or since these 1952 incidents that can be considered in support of the theory?

2nd question regarding the temperature inversion theory:  Are there any incidents of the same nature and description available from any other city, or airport facilities anywhere in the world that can be considered in support of the theory?
 
 

NEXT PAGE